Options in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: The incidence and duration of chemotherapy-induced emesis, pathophysiology of the emetic response, and antiemetic treatment of options are reviewed. OVERVIEW: Nausea and vomiting are among the most common and debilitating side effects of cancer chemotherapy. If not controlled, these side effects may interfere with the delivery of potentially life-saving treatment. Acute, delayed, and anticipatory nausea and vomiting may be prevented by appropriate antiemetic therapy. Drug selection is based on the emetogenicity of the patient's cancer treatment and potency of the antiemetic agent. Efficacy and safety of the antiemetic regimen are often improved by combining agents with different mechanisms of action. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: By preventing and controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis, clinicians may improve cancer patients' functional status and quality of life significantly. Improved tolerability may lead to greater patient acceptance of chemotherapy and prevent premature withdrawal from or cessation of treatment. Controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis also helps to decrease the direct and indirect costs of managing cancer.

Prevention of acute emesis in cancer patients following high-dose cisplatin with the combination of oral dolasetron and dexamethasone.

PURPOSE: Dolasetron is a 5-HT3 antagonist antiemetic with active oral and intravenous formulations. The effects of this class are enhanced when combined with dexamethasone. This study tested the ability of the combination of oral dolasetron 200 mg and oral dexamethasone 20 mg to prevent acute emesis in cancer patients receiving initial cisplatin at doses > or = 70 mg/m2. Additionally, patients were randomly assigned to receive a second dosage of the regimen 16 hours later to improve control of acute symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 75 patients were entered, with 38 randomized to the two-dose regimen. Thirty-five percent were women and 77% had lung cancer. RESULTS: Overall, the regimen prevented acute vomiting in 76% (95% confidence interval, 65% to 85%), including 74% of 35 patients who received cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. There was no observed difference in emesis prevention between the one-dose (76%) and two-dose (76%) regimens (95% confidence interval for the difference, -20% to 19%). The median time to the onset of emesis was 19 hours for the one-dose regimen and 17 hours for the two-dose regimen in those patients with emesis. Headache occurred in 11% who received one dose and 16% who received two doses. CONCLUSION: The combination of oral dolasetron 200 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg given only once prevented acute emesis in 76% of patients who received cisplatin > or = 70 mg/m2. Administration of a second dose of the regimen did not improve the observed prevention rate or delay the time to emesis. This one-dose oral regimen has comparable or better effectiveness than reported results of intravenous combination regimens in preventing cisplatin-induced vomiting and merits further study and use.

Oral dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving moderately emetogenic platinum-containing chemotherapy. Oral Dolasetron Dose Response Study Group.

PURPOSE: This double-blind, dose-response study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate for preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving their first course of moderately emetogenic platinum-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive a single oral dose of 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg dolasetron 30 minutes before receiving IV carboplatin (275-400 mg/m2)- or cisplatin (20-50 mg/m2)-containing chemotherapy, then monitored for nausea and vomiting for 24 hours. RESULTS: Three hundred seven cancer patients from 32 sites completed the study. There was a statistically significant dose response across the four doses for complete response (no emetic episodes or rescue medication): 44.7%, 71.3%, 73.2%, and 82.5% for the 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg doses of dolasetron, respectively. Patients' nausea severity and patient satisfaction visual analogue scale scores also showed a statistically significant trend with dose. All doses of dolasetron were well tolerated. The most common adverse events were headache (17.6%) and dizziness (2.0%). DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates the safety and antiemetic efficacy of oral dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving moderately emetogenic platinum-containing chemotherapy with the highest antiemetic activity observed at 200 mg.

Randomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil plus high dose folinic acid versus 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid plus methyl-lomustine for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer is generally incurable. The most active regimen available, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (Leucovorin), produces response rates of approximately 25% to 30%. Methyl-lomustine is a nitrosourea with modest activity against colorectal cancer. A randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the impact the addition of methyl-lomustine would have on response, duration of survival, and survival rates in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: The methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin (MFL) regimen consisted of methyl-lomustine (110 mg/m2), administered on Day 1 of each 8-week cycle with six weekly boluses of 5-FU (600 mg/m2), and Leucovorin (500 mg/m2). The FL treatment arm consisted of the administration of 5-FU and Leucovorin as described above. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity after each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Of 319 patients included in this trial, 297 (93.1%) had disease evaluable for response and toxicity: 145 received MFL, and 152 received FL. In this trial, 526 courses of MFL and 529 courses of FL were administered. Methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin treatment resulted in 4 complete and 30 partial responses (response rate, 21.9%), and FL treatment resulted in 9 complete and 33 partial responses (response rate, 26.4%). There was no significant difference in median survival duration between patients in the two arms (MFL = 48 weeks, FL = 51 weeks). However, MFL was significantly more toxic with greater myelosuppression than was FL (Grade 3-4 neutropenia: MFL = 56 patients, FL = 27 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: MFL = 49 patients, FL = 2 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 anemia: MFL = 15 patients, FL = 6 patients, P < 0.001; and more prolonged median duration of granulocytopenia: MFL = 9 days, FL = 7 days, P < 0.001; and thrombocytopenia: MFL = 14 days, FL = 7.5 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Because the addition of methyl-lomustine in the MFL schedule markedly increased the toxicity of the regimen and because the FL regimen was as effective as MFL, the authors recommend that Leucovorin and 5-FU remain the treatment choice for treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Unfavorable histologies of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with ProMACE-CytaBOM: a groupwide Southwest Oncology Group study.

Chemotherapy using cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine, methotrexate with leucovorin, and prednisone (ProMACE-CytoBOM) for patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas was tested by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) to confirm the activity of the regimen and to test the feasibility and safety of administering third-generation drug regimens in a cooperative group setting. On day 1, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide were administered, followed by cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine and methotrexate with leucovorin given on day 8. There were 51 complete remissions (CRs) among 78 previously untreated patients (65%) having clinical stage II-IV disease. The median length of follow-up is 37.9 months with 57% of patients alive at 3 years and 50% of CR patients free of disease at 3 years. Patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma have the best survival (63% at 3 years) and relapse-free survival (RFS; 68% at 3 years with no relapses seen after 14 months). Administration of ProMACE-CytoBOM is feasible and safe in a cooperative group setting with 84% of 537 courses of treatment given exactly according to schedule and fatal toxicities seen in five patients (6%). ProMACE-CytaBOM may represent improved treatment for diffuse large-cell lymphoma, but the modest differences compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) indicate the need for a prospective randomized comparative trial.